--You should read this one-- --it's not a review out of spite-- in short: The Company contacts candidates and puts them in a queue, they don't work parallely that means, they don't do test to candidates in order to choose the best fit, from a group. phone call - then on hold +14 days - then generic mail. When they reject a candidate, there isn't specific sets of reasons or results based on meeting and ampirical measures. More details and 1 positive thing. There was only a phone interview on Feb 28th 2022 After the recruiter and I passed on each on the requirements, I was told there another out source elment outside the company will do an interview with me, to test my professional experience. The next week I contact to the recruiter to know when due the appointment would set, got an answer that they'll let me know when he's availble. This review was written on 16.3 After I got a generic mail but with an option to reply to the sender ^_^. She agreed to contact me, (might be because I stated that I'll write a review on the expirience), and try explaning that they chose the best candidate fits to a "specific niche", (data is data) That was the "gap" between whom ever they chose to other candidates. Well I think I was just their backup plan. The only one positive thing, on the personal level, is that she had the balls to do the uncomfortable thing which is to call me and try to explain "logic" - Kudos to that lady. On the personal level I think I like her. This is not a jock, she did her job the best way, Other elements that are involed in the process, im not so sure. Better not wasting your time, like me try to get a clear view on their process. If you smell somthing fishy when they don't set up the next thing after the phone call - tell them politly that your time is very important and that you prefer a better company culture. Again - it's not out of spite, if your not junior in your field there will be plenty of places that will take you. and you've earn it.