Staff Assistant III applicants have rated the interview process at Harvard University with 2.7 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 67% positive. To compare, the company-average is 67% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Staff Assistant III roles take an average of 24 days to get hired, when considering 7 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Harvard University overall takes an average of 35 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Harvard University as a Staff Assistant III according to 7 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 31%
One on one interview: 25%
Group panel interview: 13%
Skills test: 13%
Background check: 6%
Drug test: 6%
Presentation: 6%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
It was friendly. they answered all my questions and were very responsive. The entire process took approx 2 months. The interview process started with a phone screen and went to 2 in-person interveiws.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Harvard University (Cambridge, MA)
Interview
The process began with a screening call that was very streamlined, general questions. This was followed by a phone interview with the Human Resources person in the specific department I was interviewing with. Then I was brought in to meet the team. The in person meeting consisted of one on ones and a group portion. This all took place within two to three weeks.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
What's the biggest challenge you've faced and how did you overcome it?
I applied online. I interviewed at Harvard University
Interview
The hiring and interview process, for me, lasted 3 months. That included first round, second round, third round, and final round. Also included skills based testing and reference checks. Beginning with a phone interview, the process culminated with an in person panel interview.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How do you alter your presentation when speaking with a peer versus with a donor and/or high level manager?