While I am okay with not receiving an offer, I think there is a lot of opportunity for Capital RX to streamline and improve the candidate experience. The interview process consisted of 5 rounds plus 1 additional (and very short) touch base meeting. The first round was with Recruiting, and was your standard screener. Second was with the Hiring Manager, and allowed for a deeper understanding the role and the company's HR needs. The 3rd - 5th interviews were originally pitched as a "Panel Interview" but were just a series of 1:1 interviews. I am currently unemployed, so I have the flexibility and time to accommodate this, however, this set up is a bit disrespectful of an employed person's time as they would need to find a few additional hours to interview. My 4th and 5th interviews were very disorganized. One person was 40 minutes late for a 60 minute meeting, and the other 10 minutes late for a 30 minute meeting. While I understand things happen, communication at the time of the event regarding rescheduling should be standard process. I felt like I was confused with another candidate during one of my interviews, and that my resume wasn't reviewed prior to a meeting. It also seemed like I was being sold another role instead of the one I had applied to, and interviewed, for. I briefly discussed potential offer and start dates with the Hiring Manager, but a few days later I received a stock rejection email that comes built into the ATS. I'm not sure if its against the company's policy or practice to provide any feedback to final stage candidates, but I think doing so shows a level of professional courtesy that was clearly lacking throughout the interview process.