I applied online. I interviewed at Moma (New York, NY) in Jul 2026
Interview
After submitting for the job on their website, I was invited to an in-person interview on location at the museum's office and was offered a visitor's pass to tour around the museum for free while observing the current employees in action.
I interviewed to be the Assistant to the Chief Curator of Architecture and Design, and I have to say, it was hands down one of the most alarming and icky experiences of my professional life. Mid-level management deliberately abused their position and tried to coerce and manipulate me on several occasions. Looking back now, it doesn't seem like they had any real intention of hiring me whatsoever, yet they asked me to complete several take-home assignments and concocted a demeaning and dehumanizing interview process just to be mean-spirited. Asked me excessively detailed, heavily micromanage-y questions that would be impossible for me to answer so I was set up to fail. It also felt like mid-level management was subtly trying to psychologically pit me against and instill antagonism in me towards the person whom I was interviewing to be an assistant to, and I think also tried to instill antagonism in him towards me (very icky, manipulative, weird + counterproductive. A healthy working relationship is built on empathy and mutual respect, not hostility and divisive control. Likewise, a healthy working environment is built on psychological safety and not psychological manipulation). Several other colleagues at the museum were involved in the process, and it seemed like they were all manipulated and triangulated by mid-level management to do their dirty work and be deliberately nasty and disrespectful to me for no reason (flying monkeys). I overlooked the red flags and ignored my better judgment and instincts that told me something was off throughout the process because the person I was interviewing to assist seemed like a really intelligent and interesting guy, and I was genuinely excited about the possibility of making the connection. I also felt uncomfortable and bad for him to an extent because it seemed like mid-level management was covertly backstabbing and trying to undermine his position by pitting his own team (and assistant) against him to exert coercive control/covert manipulation on him on some level as well. (Also, just severely distasteful and an incredibly bad look for the museum to try and instrumentalize an interview process and job applicant for your corrosive triangulation tactics and petty in-fighting). At the same time, it was a severe abuse of power directed towards me and a very disheartening experience to learn that this museum allows its staff to deliberately try to exploit, cheat, and abuse young people who are earnestly looking for work and hoping to advance in their career. Wildly unprofessional and abusive experience all around.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
How would you stay in touch with other assistants outside of formal channels? (Meaning, would you gossip and be friendly to your colleagues for ulterior motives and then report back to me what you hear?) I was extremely confused and didn't understand what was being asked of me. Looking back, it seems like it was really just a way for management to abuse the imbalance of the interview process and try to exert coercive control over a job applicant (major ick).
How do you like to be managed? Less the question itself than the way it was asked that felt icky and off, but I tried to spin it into a positive and replied that I think the right balance of mentorship and autonomy works best. I think management then deliberately designed the interview questions for the next couple of rounds to be heavily micromanage-y just to try to undermine my confidence and desire for autonomy. Again, major ick.
I first had a call with HR walking through my CV and then an interview with department administrator curator. The call was very abrupt and didn’t set up time with me and interview was scheduled
Digital Design applicants have rated the interview process at Moma with 2 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 100% positive. To compare, the company-average is 59.1% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -