Market Risk Analyst applicants have rated the interview process at Optiver with 3.2 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 20% positive. To compare, the company-average is 49.2% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Market Risk Analyst roles take an average of 14 days to get hired, when considering 5 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Optiver overall takes an average of 21 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Optiver as a Market Risk Analyst according to 5 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 40%
Skills test: 20%
One on one interview: 20%
Presentation: 20%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
Submit CV and application. Series of online assessments like remembering numbers, mental math, and general IQ stuff. Video behavioural interview with HR. Rather unprofessional as HR was looking at the phone during the interview. Asked typical behavioural questions.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Why this company? When have you dealt with pressure?
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Optiver (Sydney) in Mar 2022
Interview
Interview was standard, questions were exactly what you expect from any other behavioral interview. The interview was through Zoom.
The Campus Recruitment Team are all incredibly robotic and display zero personality throughout the interview. It is almost like doing a one sided HireVue digital interview.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Why did you apply to this specific role and not the others? Describe a quantitative project that you undertook and the outcome.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Optiver (Chicago, IL) in May 2022
Interview
I was really excited about my interview with Optiver as I had heard great things. My experience is not in markets so I was approaching this interview as an opportunity to learn more about the space and see if it would be a good option for a lateral move. My interview was supposed to be a 60 minute interview with two senior members of the risk team. My interviewer was 5 minutes late and was a junior member of the team - not either one of the team members the recruiter told me I would speak with. My total interview lasted maybe 25 minutes and consisted of the interviewer reading my resume to me and asking very surface level questions. It felt very strange and unscripted.
I didn't have some of the technical experience they were looking for (which as stated previously makes sense because this would have been a lateral for me), but some points of the interview felt a bit degrading. For example, I was asked how strong my math skills were. Given my undergrad degrees are both in engineering, this felt like a strange question.
Overall, I was pretty disappointed with my interview experience. The company seemed to be more focused on hiring people with a specific skill set rather than investing in interested candidates who maybe did not meet the exact hiring criteria.