2 hours, 5 questions, 2 SQL code unrelated to fraud and 3 subjective text answers about various cases. Once I passed that the next interview was with 2 current decision scientists. Very professional interview, they were very kind and asked questions without rushing me. The first ~30 minutes was checking how would I commit fraud on Paypal. The first case (with me suggesting and them asking) led us to discuss the idea of account take over. The second one I suggested eventually led to stolen credentials. It's good to know how you would commit each one of these frauds as that's what they asked about from start to finish. How would you bring the funds in? If you have others' details, when would you use them? Registering from your house or theirs? how would you withdraw the money. The next ~30 minutes they showed me two transactions and asked if I'd approve or disapprove. They were more interested in my chain of thought and wanted to hear both sides of the transaction (so even if I approved what were my concerns that maybe not approve). At the end we spoke a bit in English to see I know how where I shared about myself.