The first interview was a phone screen with HR. He asked about my experience and gave a brief description about the roles they were looking to fill. The follow-up interview was a skype call with the same HR rep to discuss my "Life Story." This was an unusual approach to interviewing a candidate. While I appreciate the rep's explanation that this prevents "B.S." answers to stock questions, it is difficult to sum up one's life in 15 to 30 minutes without much indication from the rep if they're hearing relevant information (nor much indication with regards to what counts as "relevant"). The process was pleasant, but tricky to navigate. My general sense from this experience is that the answers didn't matter much as long as the rep liked you and your career path (i.e., "life story"?) somewhat matched the position's description. But this is only my guess. It was a deeply opaque approach to interviewing, an undertaking which is already inscrutable for the most part. The interviews were for a technical role but said interviews did not involve any technical discussions besides the listing of technologies used (little more than buzzwords). I was disappointed not to have been able to talk shop with developers, or at least to take on some technical challenge, before receiving a final answer from the rep despite having gone two interviews deep.