1. Phone screen with recruiter that checked basic qualifications 2. Call with hiring manager that covered basic introductions 3. Technical project (this part is the largest factor in downgrading my review from good to bad because the project amounted to free consulting) 4. Series of interviews with different team leads In terms of process and general experience, the people were very friendly and there was relatively fast follow-up of decisions to move forward, but the recruiters and process were disorganized. I was asked for the data to my technical project five minutes before my final interview and weeks after I had originally presented. They bounced me around from recruiter to recruiter and their internal data kept getting deleted. The description of the role also changed multiple times throughout the interview. In terms of content of the interview, they asked for a technical project that was virtually free consulting for them, especially since they now have my code instead of just the presentation of results. A fictitious problem set would be one thing, but this was actual work that they could use in production because the results were directly applicable and actionable in context.

The main part of the interview consisted of case studies. One case study was asking about two-part pricing in Uber eats (fixed delivery fee+percentage) and the other on incentives to drivers.