In total, I participated in four interviews and one presentation: - Phone Interview: A 30-minute introductory call. - Team Interviews: Three separate interviews with the hiring managers and members of the project management team. - Presentation: A final session where I was provided with data to create and present a SteerCo deck tailored for an executive team.

Recruiter screening, followed by behavioral interview, followed by two job fit interviews, and an executive interview. Process was not bad, although it is very long, but the main feedback was that some of the interviewers seem to have pre-conceived notions of experience. This may be due to some of the interviewers being acquired, instead of organically Workday, but they seemed to dismiss prior experience if it wasn't the same solution they had been working on. Just something to note, make sure to explain EXACTLY how it's related to them or they won't understand.

I went through six interviews and a panel presentation, and the process was intense. I was informed that I had been selected for the position but was told I needed to wait for budget approval. However, after two months of hearing the same response without receiving an official offer, I eventually stopped following up. It’s baffling to think that a company would post a job, conduct interviews, and even tell a candidate they’ve been selected, only to later reveal that the position still needs approval. It makes no sense. Having hired teams and worked with HR for 20 years, I’ve never encountered a situation where a candidate is selected for an unapproved position, only to have their time wasted for two months and then told the position isn't approved. It’s not just frustrating; it’s unacceptable. Clearly, trust is not one of their hiring principles.