Akamai reviews

4.3

89% would recommend to a friend

(3,473 total reviews)
avatar

Tom Leighton

91% approve of CEO

75% positive business outlook

Akamai has an employee rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars, based on 3,473 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Akamai employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
4.0
Feb 7, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Extremely knowledgeable colleagues, regarding technical development, support and sales -Teams are focused on what is achievable, even if the long term vision may be challenging -Great (vastly improved from past years) culture of inclusion and diversity. -Thoughtful debate is active and happening in certain circles, about how to continually improve the organization. -Fully remote work is the norm for most jobs, and it is good for productivity. -Great work/life balance. -The long term viability of this company's technology and vision is awesome, and will definitely result in growth, possibly on a large scale, if the teams are allowed to participate in the development management process., to avoid major failures.

Cons

-Top down management is still very much the norm here. -Agility and scrum are not well understood across the organization, so Waterfall practices still drive a majority of silos. -The term "scrum master" is seen as a bad thing by some very concerned and vocal members of the organization, because of the word "master", meanwhile many of the people in this debate have Masters degrees, employed a Master Carpenter/Plumber, or may have participated in ToastMasters. -Unrealistic longer term goals are presented by leadership sometimes, and open statement of short term goals can be frowned upon by some other leaders -Siloed information is the norm. -Human Resources seems to be in some transitional state, as hiring new talent was very challenging, with slow response times, disconnection from talent, and jobs appearing and disappearing from the listings, while HR consistently spams applicants with position listings.

2.0
Dec 31, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They are willing to negotiate low-ball offers.

Cons

Their technical leads have poor leadership skills which harm their reports and destroy productivity. Instead of positively motivating their reports, they resort to playing mind games. They will not be open to listening to your inputs especially if you don't fit the mold of a "serious professional." They withhold information to maintain an advantage over you and use that knowledge at the right time to undercut you and make you look foolish. They talk in pseudo-technical terms to try to intimidate/impress and confuse; fortunately people who are really technically competent see through this posturing. The onboarding process and the people involved result in an unnecessarily excruciatingly painful training experience. They rely upon you picking up on rushed, poorly explained training and expect you to learn via rote memorization. There is no careful explanation of the product passed the corporate training which is not adequate if you need to develop on the product. The "mentor" has no patience, is not good at explaining things in a manner that can be understood, doesn't understand that everything they know will not be known by the other person unless and until explained properly. Eventually (after a few sessions) they will blame you for not knowing things that you couldn't have possibly have known (product internals which you can't look up anywhere). There are videos of a former employing giving training, but the managers and trainers call that person "an idiot" so not sure the videos are relevant or even useful especially seeing how long ago this training was given. The documentation is poorly written. It's clear it was never reviewed for clarity, or accuracy. They do not use modern tools and methods to document the product. There are operational issues. Though I hired on as a data scientist my real day-to-day job was working as a support person addressing customer issues with the product which are numerous. Customer issues were often described poorly which made it difficult to address the issues in a timely fashion, especially in light of the bad training. There was an explicitly stated expectation that these issues needed to be resolved in a day and there was pressure applied to make this happen which was counterproductive. Whenever I had issues with my manager, how I was being onboarded, or how I thought daily operations transpired I would try to bring these issues to the attention of someone in the org to try to help resolve them. I was ignored. My efforts to resolve my issues were to no avail. This needs to be fixed! Some employees have very poor communication skills yet they are put over you to train you and have authority over you. Akamai really needs to take a hard look at this and make sure that there are not any language barriers interfering with productivity of the company and be realistic about who can train and/or manage whom based on the communication skills of its employees.

Viewing 181 - 183 of 3,473 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,822 Akamai reviews submitted anonymously by Akamai employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Akamai is right for you.