Boston Consulting Group reviews

4.2

84% would recommend to a friend

(9,602 total reviews)
avatar

Christoph Schweizer

87% approve of CEO

76% positive business outlook

Boston Consulting Group has an employee rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 9,602 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Boston Consulting Group employee rating is 22% above average for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

10K reviews
3.0
Sep 23, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Compensation (~150k base for North American consultants, target 15% bonus up to max 30%) Benefits, health insurance is top notch, $5 copy for EVERYTHING Great brand name, especially if you go into a big corporate afterward Strong training programs, both group and 1:1 Ability to switch around case work Very lax travel / reimbursement policies when you are on a travel case - effectively no limit on how much you can charge for dinner, etc. You keep all your points and miles = free vacations! Many great people who are smart and genuinely nice. This is not a Pro nor Con, but there are some real differences between the regions and offices on staffing model, type of cases, and partnership. For example, South System is very profitable but had a reputation for being a high-burn place, staffing is more directive (lower ability to say no to cases). Chicago has a reputation for having a gentler work-life balance, and if you are good you have more say over the type of cases you are staffed on. West Coast is supposed to have less travel to a certain extent, etc.

Cons

The spectrum of experiences at BCG is extremely wide. You can have an amazing time or be completely miserable. Your experience depend on your managers, the client, the type of cases, the system / office you sit in, your relationship with the staffer, etc. Workload: I'd say the intensity and the quantity of workload is a big con. It's hard to maintain a personal life when you are staffed, esp when you are traveling. BCG tries to make it better by implementing a program called predictable time off, but when a team has to explicitly establish that it's NOT okay to work until midnight on Fridays, something's wrong. Type of cases: BCG does just as much strategy work as McK and Bain, but the trend in cases is going towards big implementation or transformation cases, which many times include org redesign or "delayering" (ie mass layoffs), and that kind of work can be unfulfilling, repetitive, but incredibly high-burn - you work 80-90 hours a week making sure that the people who are on the fire list is actually fired and so you can count them as "synergies". These are also the cases that don't get publicized during recruiting. Danger of being pigeon-holed. What this means is that you do a 6-month case on XYZ, you hate it but it goes OK. Then another XYZ-like case comes along, your chances of being pulled on it is higher especially as you are now an "expert". Travel: ultimately consulting is a travel-intense profession, and that does wear on you after a while.

1.0
Mar 14, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent pay and health benefits

Cons

The work-life balance is simply unsustainable—60-70 hour weeks are standard. No matter how much the firm claims to care about sustainability, the expectation is that you’ll always be available. The culture is extremely political. Who you align with internally can be just as important, if not more, than the quality of your work. Promotions, staffing decisions, and feedback often feel more about playing the game than actual merit. If you don’t have the right internal advocates, good luck moving up. The constant travel is another issue. Even in situations where remote work would be just as effective, there’s an outdated expectation to travel to “colocate” with teams. It’s exhausting and unnecessary, and it adds an extra layer of stress to an already demanding job. Worst of all is the performance management process. Feedback is often vague, contradictory, and, at times, completely arbitrary. It can feel like decisions about your trajectory have already been made before reviews even happen. Gaslighting is not an exaggeration—one week, you might hear that you’re exceeding expectations, and the next, you’re suddenly “underperforming” with little explanation.

3.0
May 3, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Non-consulting tracks are great for those who want to settle down with not so competitive pay, minimum hours of work, and great benefits for the family. Truly very smart people (most are on the consulting track of course) to work with.

Cons

Non-consulting tracks are career suicides for those who want to aim high. Minimal team work, second class to consultants, and minimal transferal skills outside of research roles. Internal processes are extremely manual and time consuming. Hard to defend in front of clients when they pay big bucks for digital strategy but there is nothing digital going on within the firm.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 9,602 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,858 Boston Consulting Group reviews submitted anonymously by Boston Consulting Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Boston Consulting Group is right for you.