employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Child Mind Institute

Is this your company?

Child Mind Institute reviews

1.8

6% would recommend to a friend

(118 total reviews)

Harold S. Koplewicz, MD

7% approve of CEO

11% positive business outlook

Child Mind Institute has an employee rating of 1.8 out of 5 stars, based on 118 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a poor working experience there. The Child Mind Institute employee rating is 48% below average for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

118 reviews
5.0
Nov 26, 2016

An Exceptional Opportunity

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I sensed from the beginning that this wasn't like any other nonprofit organization where I had worked before. There's a strong sense of mission and ownership of the work by almost every professional -- which creates a fun, engaging atmosphere and culture. The pace is fast and there are clear expectations for performance, but overall the culture is very fair. It tends to attract top talent in, and outside of, the nonprofit industry. It's a fantastic place to learn, grow, and work with a sense of passion toward a great mission -- which is helping treat, research, and educate about children's mental health and learning disorders. Highly recommended.

Cons

If you are not the type of professional who handles constructive criticism well, or if you prefer a slower pace in your work, this may not be for you. Child Mind Institute functions more like a for-profit company at times, with what can be a demanding work load and intense schedule. (That said, the days are fairly traditional business hours, 9:00 to 5:30 or 6:00.) If you like this sort of challenge, however, it's a great place to experience many new opportunities and grow.

1.0
Jul 22, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Beautiful office, smart clinicians and nice staff associates. Good benefits, generous PTO, monthly staff lunches, high-profile organization. FOUNDATION: Great mission, good fundraising ability, good hours. CLINICAL: Very smart, nice clinicians and staff associates. They do great work, and are leaders in their field.

Cons

Where to begin? I should've heeded the previous reviews, but they're absolutely accurate about CMI being a toxic environment. CMI execs/HR know very well about these reviews, but simply choose to disregard them (as I did, to my detriment). FOUNDATION: Management is untrustworthy (as is HR), unfocused (at the whims of the president), and unorganized. Many staffers don't have the skillsets needed for their jobs, but are hired because most others are scared away from applying (I now know why), or have some connection to the Board or donors. Executive leadership is poisonous: self serving, disorganized, and quick to blame others (usually junior staff). Management frequently is indecisive or doesn't want to take responsibility for projects, so if they are unsuccessful (in reality, or just in the president's view), they won't be blamed. Routinely, decisions are compelled to be made by consensus of a number of influential staff that have no expertise in that particular project. Another review mentioned having to work on 'emergency' projects that have become so because of poor planning by management -- this is absolutely accurate, and happens very often, if not weekly. Junior staff follows Executives' lead, and work in fear, seeking to avoid being blamed for something. Due to indecisiveness of executives, they lack real direction and leadership, and isn't able to grow. Junior staff has also become infamous for filing complaints with HR or management for any perceived slights. The president is an NYC socialite, obsessed with celebrities, and a bully, and sets the tone for the organization. It's a running "joke" amongst staff that he's feared, unreasonable, and obsessed with celebs. (there have been quite a few lawsuits found in the public record) YELLS (!) at staff... often. He's elitist, and tends to judge staff by their background/connections/school. (which is ironic, knowing his background). He often creates chaos when he gets an idea or a goal in mind (viable or not), and staff is compelled to make that a top priority, regardless of other projects. Extremely high staff turnover -- staff often talks about how people come and go quickly. Executive leadership has continued to change drastically for a number of years, due to the above.

1.0
Jul 6, 2016

Disappointing

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not sure. Some nice people but they are ignored or fired. They like uppity folks who do no real work and treat men and women badly. HR can be

Cons

Executive leadership poisonous: petty, self serving, mean, and blaming of others. The man next to me cried after meetings every week and yelling continued. We worked so hard through emergencies and still were yelled at when it was not our fault. Development turnover very high

Viewing 103 - 105 of 118 Reviews

Glassdoor has 145 Child Mind Institute reviews submitted anonymously by Child Mind Institute employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Child Mind Institute is right for you.