Crunchyroll reviews

3.4

57% would recommend to a friend

(239 total reviews)
avatar

Rahul Purini

53% approve of CEO

46% positive business outlook

Crunchyroll has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 239 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Crunchyroll employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Arts, Entertainment & Recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

239 reviews
1.0
Jan 22, 2017

Management is a Nightmare

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Most people outside of the highest level of management were a pleasure to work with as they were fun, talented, and hard working. • There were even some good mid and upper-mid level managers. • Catered lunch,dinners, and snacks were provided. • Office was laid out nicely and has a game room (pool table, ping pong, air hockey, etc.) • The Crunchyroll (non-engineering) business appears to be running mostly smoothly by the former CEO

Cons

As the title says, upper management is a nightmare to deal with which caused work to be miserable for many different people, the engineering org specifically. People tried to bring up issues directly to upper management with an abundance of detail and proposed solutions but nothing changed. Even the concerns from mid and upper-mid level managers were ignored and they were kept in the dark about major decisions. Upper management did not know how to build a product and could not properly plan the assembly line to construct it. Worse, they did not lean on anyone worthwhile to pick up the slack in planning. The opposite occurred, power was removed from other people. A strategy to get around the lack of planning that I'm sure the CPO thought was brilliant was to get people to work late just for the sake of working late when upper management made sure they just put in their standard 9-5 work day. On top of working long hours, co-workers were blamed for being behind schedule when they weren't the problem, the actual problems all came back to management. Late nights were often avoidable if they had listened to concerns we had months prior and even when there were late nights, they didn't have a plan of what to accomplish with that extra time. The CTO is a businessman that happens to be the CEO of an outsourcing company that we get some development work from. The quality of the work from the outsourcing company is subpar and has caused many domino effect type bugs for our site and services. This is because their company is only built on throwing bodies at problems and supporting codebases for short periods of time. After a major round of layoffs in the main office, it was announced that the outsourcing company's engineers would be leveraged to replace the workforce that was let go and then some. This happened in direct conflict with what we were continually told, which was that outsourcing company would not be replacing our engineers but that we would be scaling up on getting engineers from both sides. The last time we were told this was by the CEO not even a week before the layoffs. Upper management repeatedly claimed that the chosen CTO was not a conflict of interest but the facts speak for themselves. The CEO, CTO, and CPO seemed to be the only ones that evaluated the CTO's company. All other input was ignored. To future engineers, it has been some time since I could recommend working here. Especially if you want to be respected and do fulfilling work.

3.0
Apr 17, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some compelling benefits at Crunchyroll, including relatively flexible hours (depending on who your boss(es) are), health/vision/dental insurance, decent pay and a new bonus structure. The work here is interesting, you can work on a variety of projects (again, if your managers let you shift around) and get to work with some really smart people.

Cons

Crunchyroll has had a really hard time with growth in the last year or so. The company has tried to put many (many, many) plans in place in a variety of areas of the company with fairly poor adoption. There is a relatively new product management group, which is a mix of seasoned veterans and people who have been doing this role for less than a year due to migrating from other areas of the company. This has lead to a very sloppy attempt at agile development and many communication woes between stakeholders of various projects. There's also not enough project managers to focus on many pieces of work so they can be spread pretty thin, typically leaving some projects in the dark. The company recently hired a new CEO and CTO, effectively replacing much of the leadership that was already in the company and stepped on a the toes of many people who had been here for a long time. With the new CEO coming on board, the culture of the company is effectively shifting to be a mini-Google, but not necessarily in a good way. It's like trying to make a mid-size startup work like an arm of a giant company. The company is in dire need of more seniority and leadership in most departments, but entirely unaware of how to go about acquiring it. Given that it's grown so much in the last year or so, no lessons were learned along the way for scaling in a reasonable manner. Many new hires were promised stock options at hire but not granted any initial accrual for over a year! On that same note, it took over 8 months to complete a "leveling" structure which effectively pushed everyone into bands that allow the new CEO and leadership to hire in brand new VP level leadership.

1.0
Feb 16, 2023

“Unification”

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart, talented legacy folks. Get to enjoy the irresponsibility over-the-top investment in office real estate.

Cons

At least when it was owned by Warner, it was still pretty hands-off. But after the Funimation merge, every business decision, including why we’re abandoning previous long-term priorities for short-term gains, why people are being laid-off, etc. - it all has a go-to explanation now: “unification”. This excuse has been the reason for two reorgs so far, plus a third expected in the coming month. Layoffs out of the blue came yesterday, and people were let go who should absolutely not have been - some long-time employees who were with the company for years in critical positions with tons of legacy knowledge, some just newly hired. Leadership is even explicitly not blaming the timing on the market. Given the goals set for 2025, it’s absurd to go about things this way. The company was very successful during the pandemic - where did they invest those gains? Certainly not in hiring, certainly not in infrastructure, certainly not in feature dev. Moreso than anything, it feels like they’re laying off people who spoke out against decisions - though how they did that, who knows? There’s no openness in monthly all-staff meetings, and Q&A is locked down. Very different from pre-covid Crunchyroll. And one last frustration: for a cultural performance, in the SF office, they brought uniformed cops on-site to perform, no notice given to the org. Just consistently tone-deaf, not just this, but also especially every time they praise their hybrid model.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 239 Reviews

Glassdoor has 295 Crunchyroll reviews submitted anonymously by Crunchyroll employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Crunchyroll is right for you.