Electroimpact reviews

3.3

51% would recommend to a friend

(135 total reviews)
avatar

Peter Zieve

34% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Electroimpact has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 135 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Electroimpact employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

135 reviews
4.0
Jan 26, 2017

Mechanical Engineer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very little micro-managing, profit sharing, great benefits

Cons

Very low starting pay vs other jobs in the area and long periods in between reviews

2.0
Sep 22, 2016

Career Suicide - Stay AWAY!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Flexible Hours - Culturally Homogeneous - Loose connection with reality

Cons

- Flexible Hours - there is no guarantee anyone you may need to talk to will come in at the same time you do, making collaboration difficult. - The "EI" way is as follows: New hires are typically clueless grads who have no idea what to expect in a working environment. These new engineers are the technician work force that runs operations. Why hire engineers instead of technicians? Because it is cheaper and prevents the aerospace machinists union from getting traction at EI. Starting engineer salaries are less than the average laborer salaries in the Seattle area. -Most of the claims made during my interview process did not come true: "Nobody pays $70,000 starting salary in Seattle, maybe on the east coast they do" - Straight from the CEO during my interview. In reality, they do. "The raises are good" : This data is made public at EI, and it takes on average 5 years to get up to a median starting salary for the Seattle area. "Profit sharing makes up for the low pay" also takes 3-5 years before you will get anything. Supposedly raises are based on a formula driven by the scores your manager gives you, but they are very loosely linear - IE your raises are not tied to your performance, but the whims of the CEO. "you can switch projects if you don't like the one you are on" Not true in my experience. "We have a flat management structure" My experience was that you will just have an untrained and ineffective manager. "the work is interesting" There is no guarantee of doing any engineering work starting out. I saw people with 10+ years at the company still doing low level work. This cripples your chances of advancing your career by switching to a different company. Who will want to hire a mid-level engineer with 5 years of experience as a technician? No one. - There is no investment in new employees - since everyone here is an engineer, you are completely expendable. You will train yourself to do whatever menial task you are given, rather than getting any valuable engineering knowledge. - There is no incentive to collaborate or be professional.

3.0
Oct 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Unparalleled freedom as an engineer to learn, design, and apply that knowledge - Large pool of knowledge to draw from - Access to cutting edge technology - After poor pay for new hires, good benefits and eventually very competitive pay. - 401(k) and cash profit sharing

Cons

- Non-supportive, sometimes combative work environment - Frequent interruption from bigoted management - No emphasis on professional conduct or reasonable communication and collaboration - Very little support for new and developing engineers

Viewing 37 - 39 of 135 Reviews

Glassdoor has 148 Electroimpact reviews submitted anonymously by Electroimpact employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Electroimpact is right for you.