Senior Leadership Perspective on ADP - Vice President ADP Employee Review

1.0
Nov 10, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very good health and child care savings accounts. ADP supports ongoing training, both in house and when budgets allow, external training to keep their associates current. Salaries are reasonable at the Director level and above.

Cons

Poor benefits; limited vacation allowance, expensive medical plans. ADP's lack of infrastructure investment is disturbing. The technology behind virtually all of their products is old, lagging behind their competitors and there is little support to upgrade. ADP's success is due to outselling their competition; senior executive management right up to Gary Butler agree that their products are not the best, but that they can outsell and out service the competition. Their sales staff are adept at steering away from product functionality because it doesn't compare to the competition. Where their competitors have automated through technology, ADP continues to struggle through labor intensive manual error prone processing. The company is hopelessly siloed with three disparate sales and service organizations which are based on their client's employee size; SBS (Small Business Services - less than 100 employees), Majors (between 100 and 999 employees) and Nationals (1000 employees or more). ADP does not have a central CRM solution, instead there are dozens of sales and service databases that do not talk with one another. This is a source of huge frustration for their clients and their own associates.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance continued education opportunity

Cons

segmented internal departments some unreasonable client escalations

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All