Sales Executive ADP TotalSource/ADP Resource - Sales Executive ADP Employee Review

1.0
Dec 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you do well it looks good on a resume. That's the only pro.

Cons

Poor leadership decisions. Promotions are given out not earned. The company has gone to an extreme MICRO MANAGEMENT focus. ADP is no longer a top employer to work for and it's only getting worse. Reps are not reimbursed for meals when they travel for company business including new hire training. The DVP's and VP's have no loyalty whatsoever. Also be prepared to work long hours and have little to no work life balance. Many 8 AM conference calls and pointless training. DVP's act unprofessional towards good reps & managers and treat them like children. Operations is unethical and incompetent.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great job and learned a lot

Cons

Work life balance/ lot of hours

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All