Good Company...Not the Right Fit - Associate Account Manager (non sales) ADP Employee Review

3.0
Jun 30, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Pay is pretty good for an entry-level position 2. Hybrid-work environment 3. Most managers are very supportive and willing to help out 4. Decent benefits 5. Work-from-home equipment provided 6. Interesting work culture

Cons

1. Payroll sucks...it just sucks (unless you REALLY love numbers and tax laws). 2. Initial training is lacking in substance and doesn't really prepare you for the true nature of the job. 3. Dealing with MANY clients who are unhappy due to incompetent Account Managers (see point #2). 4. Position can often feel like a glorified Customer Service Representative role. 5. New Account Managers often expected to juggle 40 or more clients at a time. 6. Work feels rather chaotic due to having to juggle: a) Angry client emails b) Taking incoming calls from upset clients c) Numerous "pings/messages/emails" from coworkers who are dealing with your upset clients and/or want to put the work back onto you d) Working with other departments can be quite frustrating (see point c) d) Working through client service request tickets that you have little training on how to handle let alone the right knowledge e) Expected to be constantly "on" and waiting for inbound calls f) Dealing with not only your own upset clients, but other Account Managers' clients (hint: they're probably upset in some way too) g) Schedule and attend both internal and external client meetings (who are probably upset by the way) can ALL make the job feel overwhelming.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company to work for

Cons

Nothing I can think of

avatar
ADP Response
2w
Thank you for the fantastic review and for sharing your ADP experience with us on Glassdoor!
2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All