Established Company with Terrible Management - Recruiter Adecco Employee Review

1.0
Mar 22, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pays high salary, can work 1-2 days in office

Cons

They waste so much time with meetings, high turnover, bad team collaboration and culture, spend a-lot of time logging info, low performing teams, not open to feedback, team members always fighting with each other. They will advertise the team as high performing but they barely will any jobs and are no where to be found for support. They lack servicing their clients, and only do things in the system to hit KPIs. When they ask you to come into office maybe 3 people will be there from 10 and then leave at 2pm. Terrible work environment with limited support.

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Cons

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All