employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged Employer

Good place of IT Management, not so much for IT Technologists - Anonymous employee Agilent Technologies Employee Review

3.0
Mar 3, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some really great people across IT and when you can develop the relationships across the various organizations within IT, you can get a lot done.

Cons

Communication from management to staff is relatively directive, with managers making decisions with little input from the staff who manage the technology every day. Too much reliance on outside vendors leaves Agilent employees handicapped in knowledge and ability to execute changes within the environment. Lack of documentation exacerbates the above situation, making it difficult to understand the environment within which you are trying to work. Not a lot of room for growth - unless you want to move to management. Due to the fact that so much is outsourced, skills based training is not easy to obtain.

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
Jul 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As everyone says in the reviews, the rank and file employees are generally great to work with and are highly competent. The company has a cool history in Silicon Valley.

Cons

-Comments on this site about the deterioration in the culture since the CEO transition are true. It's changed from collaborative to combative. -Priority projects get outsize funding but go nowhere. For example, a year was spent overhauling the main website, only to unveil a new one that is substantially worse if not an outright embarrassment (complete with graphics borrowed from the early 2000s). -Layoffs happen semi-regularly, with many jobs cut permanently and others transferred to countries in Asia with cheap labor. -Leadership believes in a "superstar" philosophy, giving huge sums of compensation to a select few hires they think can transform their business (only for them to flop within several months). -Communication is poor. Enterprise communications is led by someone with no self awareness (Dunning-Kruger effect). CEO communications are stilted and filled with corporate jargon nonsense about "transformation." -Stock has failed to gain despite two years of investment and cost cutting. Meanwhile, competitors like Waters continue to make gains and pose a threat to the company's market share. -Lost an important IP case that will likely result in loss of market share in one of their fastest-growing businesses (all of this is public, just Google it). -C-suite leadership is often distant and remote. Rarely mingle with employees.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All