employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged Employer

Good Place to learn but culture/loyalty lacks - Manufacturing Chemist Agilent Technologies Employee Review

3.0
Jul 29, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent place to learn biopharmaceutical world and upstream/downstream chemistry. They really do care about their employees and offer decent pay/benefits and growth opportunities.

Cons

The company culture is very boring and lacks any sense of loyalty. Their push for work/life balance is actually not as even as it seems. Certain shifts just get stuffed in barrel when it comes to production and the culture is still very white/upper middle class/science background and educated. A culture is not changed just by hiring diverse candidates, a culture is changed by UNDERSTANDING a diverse candidate base. This includes across all diversity not just race. This includes backgrounds, SES, work experiences, lifestyles etc... This is not to say you are required to know everything about everyone but as a team we didn't even eat together or ask each other questions or anything. It was do your 40 hours and go home. Period.

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
Jul 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As everyone says in the reviews, the rank and file employees are generally great to work with and are highly competent. The company has a cool history in Silicon Valley.

Cons

-Comments on this site about the deterioration in the culture since the CEO transition are true. It's changed from collaborative to combative. -Priority projects get outsize funding but go nowhere. For example, a year was spent overhauling the main website, only to unveil a new one that is substantially worse if not an outright embarrassment (complete with graphics borrowed from the early 2000s). -Layoffs happen semi-regularly, with many jobs cut permanently and others transferred to countries in Asia with cheap labor. -Leadership believes in a "superstar" philosophy, giving huge sums of compensation to a select few hires they think can transform their business (only for them to flop within several months). -Communication is poor. Enterprise communications is led by someone with no self awareness (Dunning-Kruger effect). CEO communications are stilted and filled with corporate jargon nonsense about "transformation." -Stock has failed to gain despite two years of investment and cost cutting. Meanwhile, competitors like Waters continue to make gains and pose a threat to the company's market share. -Lost an important IP case that will likely result in loss of market share in one of their fastest-growing businesses (all of this is public, just Google it). -C-suite leadership is often distant and remote. Rarely mingle with employees.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All