Array is a great place to work - Software Engineer Array (NY) Employee Review

5.0
Oct 22, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Service ownership - get to experience the full cycle of software development * Work with dedicated people * Competitive pay & benefits with 401k matching and unlimited vacation * Get to help others improve their financial situation * Work from home I read through many reviews that are pretty harsh on management, and our CEO in particular. I think a lot of people don't appreciate that good business decisions aren't necessarily obvious from an engineer's perspective. If in doubt ask questions! I have found Martin (our CEO) extremely receptive to questions. Further, I have found him to be an incredible businessman. He knows what he is doing even if he doesn't explain everything he is thinking as he goes. But again - ask him and he will be transparent about the reasons behind his decisions and priorities. The mission is honorable. There are a lot of people that don't understand how money works, how credit scores work, and how to improve their financial standing so they can accomplish personal goals.

Cons

This is a relatively small company and our management has to make course corrections along the way so we can achieve our goal of profitability soon. There are limited opportunities to get together with your coworkers since everyone works at home. I have been at Array for almost a year and haven't met any of my co-workers in person. This isn't terrible, but different than what I am accustomed to.

Explore other reviews about Array (NY)

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Cons

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Cons

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All