employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Azenta Life Sciences

Engaged Employer

A Literal Trap that halts your growth! - Biobank Technician Azenta Life Sciences Employee Review

1.0
Jun 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are little significant advantages to this position. One potential benefit is the possibility of being placed at a more recognizable biotech company, allowing you to be physically present on their campus. However, beyond that—and aside from the salary, which may be lower in rural placements compared to hubs like Boston or the Bay Area—there isn’t much else of value this role offers.

Cons

This job is a trap for young, creative, and scientifically driven individuals. It involves mind-numbing, repetitive tasks—primarily inventorying samples for hours on end. There's little to no opportunity for creative thinking or meaningful contributions to the lab’s actual scientific output. Managers treat employees like machines, not professionals. There are no team-building activities, breaks are undefined (except for the lunch break), and you're expected to input data nonstop, without pause or variation. Perhaps the most deceptive part is the recruitment process. Candidates are hired through an outsourcing consulting firm that falsely markets the position as a laboratory technician role. In reality, during the first weeks of training, it becomes abundantly clear that you will not be using any lab equipment or engaging in scientific work whatsoever. For many, by the time they realize this, it's too late to back out due to financial insecurity or a lack of alternative job options. To make matters worse, the job is filled with individuals who often do not hold bachelor’s degrees, while new hires—many of whom come in with advanced STEM degrees—are never informed of this disparity. This mismatch creates uncomfortable dynamics, including inconsistent workflows, poor communication, and a lack of professionalism across teams. It completely stifles growth—there’s no real opportunity to learn, develop soft skills, or build a career path. And let’s not forget: this is a contract job with zero security. Contracts are frequently canceled without notice, and there is a constant cycle of layoffs and rehires based on vague “project” timelines. You might be jobless weeks after starting, only to be asked to return shortly after—again, assuming you have no better option. No paid time off. Management expects you to show up every single day, and even legitimate emergencies—medical or otherwise—are met with disapproval or passive hostility. In short: this job offers little value, no stability, and certainly no respect for your time, education, or wellbeing.

Explore other reviews about Azenta Life Sciences

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like the company and my job. Our team is great, leadership is supportive. The office is really nice. It is a good job

Cons

Nothing really important to mention.

4.0
Apr 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Collaboration: The cross-functional collaboration here is genuinely one of the stronger aspects of working at Azenta. Whether you're working across departments or geographies, people are generally willing to show up and work through problems together. It doesn't feel siloed the way a lot of companies do. Culture: The culture feels human. People actually seem to care about each other, which isn't something you can say everywhere. There's a level of psychological safety that makes it easier to speak up, take initiative, and do good work without constantly watching your back. Leadership: Leadership is visible and accessible in a way that's not always the case at companies this size. There's a genuine effort to communicate direction and keep people informed, and you can tell the people at the top actually care about the mission.

Cons

Compensation & Benefits: Compensation and benefits haven't kept pace with the market. For the level of skill and experience the company expects, the total package doesn't always reflect that. If you're coming from a larger org or comparing offers, it can be a sticking point. Onsite Presence: The expectation around onsite presence feels out of step with where the industry has landed post-pandemic. Flexibility is limited, and for roles where remote work is fully viable, the requirement to be in the office regularly doesn't always have a clear business justification. IT Equipment: You don't get much say in your hardware or software setup. For people who do their best work with specific tools or have preferences around operating systems and devices, the one-size-fits-all IT approach can be a real friction point, especially in roles that are heavily computer-dependent.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All