DON'T DO IT - Field Engineer Baker Hughes Employee Review

1.0
Feb 24, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company Truck is about it

Cons

- Don't pay you overtime even though a service company was sued over this. We say in the field, who will be the one to file. Case No. 2:16-cv-01752 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania - Field work is going away and going remote. - No recognition for hard work. - Living on rigs and never see friends or family. - Will work on rigs for 5 to 6 weeks at a time with no time off with 12 hour shift and getting up in the middle of the night to pick up tools without being able to put down overtime. - We no longer wear safety patches because safety doesn't mean anything when the customer starts complaining.

Explore other reviews about Baker Hughes

5.0
May 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competent management, excellent benefits, competitive pay, and a work life balance that is impossible to compete with

Cons

The totem pole of management is so monumentally tall that the mid and upper management make decisions affecting those on the bottom with no real understanding of what the consequences of their decision are.

4.0
Feb 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong strategic direction in the energy transition space. Baker Hughes’ IET segment is well‑positioned at the intersection of industrial technology and decarbonization, and there is real commitment toward innovation in equipment, services, and digital solutions. High-caliber colleagues. The talent level is consistently strong across engineering, product management, and finance. Cross-functional teams are collaborative, and the culture values analytical rigor and thoughtful debate. Exposure to global business. Supporting IET provides insight into diverse markets—LNG, turbomachinery, industrial solutions, new energy—and offers opportunities to partner with teams across multiple regions and product lines. Leadership encourages data-driven decision-making. There is meaningful focus on improving forecasting accuracy, margin discipline, and operational cadence. Finance is seen as a strategic partner, not just a reporting function. Good flexibility and work-life balance. Hybrid work is genuinely supported, especially for roles tied to analysis, planning, and commercial strategy. Strong learning opportunities. Access to digital tools, internal programs, and cross-functional projects helps develop commercial and financial acumen.

Cons

Complex matrix structure. Decision-making can be slower than ideal due to layers of approvals and global coordination. Navigating legacy processes requires patience. Systems and data challenges. Integration of multiple ERPs and planning tools can create inefficiencies and require workarounds. Progress is being made, but modernization is ongoing. Heavy meeting cadence. Operating rhythms can be demanding, especially during forecast cycles and commercial reviews. Calendar load sometimes limits deep work time. Talent development varies by manager. While many leaders invest heavily in development, the experience can vary depending on the team and direct manager. Compensation is fair but not industry-leading. Base pay and bonuses are competitive, but long-term incentives and equity could be stronger compared to peers in the industrial and energy technology sectors.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All