Company that's lost its way. Constant layoffs, no direction, seems to be hoping for acquisition. - Senior Engineer Baker Hughes Employee Review

2.0
Feb 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, flexible work arrangements. Managers respected technical people and didn't micromanage. Most employees are high performers.

Cons

They have had layoffs it seems every year for the last decade. Nobody is safe other than executive level making the cuts. Constant restructuring & rebranding from retiring the names of the legacy OFS divisions, one baker hughes, failed hallibirton merger, being acquired by GE, combining with GE O&G, renaming to BHGE, to being sold again by GE, to new logos and another rebrand, now another restructure. There only focus seems to being acquired again and it be successful. Latest round of layoffs came from yet another restructuring into 2 business segments. It came down from executive level what positions didn't fit the new org charts and to lay them off. Managers had no say even up to director level. Indiscriminate cuts, with day's notice, no plans to replace expertise or workload. The company was already being ran very lean with no technical talent in the pipeline. Few people doing a lot of work. Sometimes only a single point of contact for entire products or services. I dont see a bright future for the company.

Explore other reviews about Baker Hughes

5.0
May 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competent management, excellent benefits, competitive pay, and a work life balance that is impossible to compete with

Cons

The totem pole of management is so monumentally tall that the mid and upper management make decisions affecting those on the bottom with no real understanding of what the consequences of their decision are.

4.0
Feb 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong strategic direction in the energy transition space. Baker Hughes’ IET segment is well‑positioned at the intersection of industrial technology and decarbonization, and there is real commitment toward innovation in equipment, services, and digital solutions. High-caliber colleagues. The talent level is consistently strong across engineering, product management, and finance. Cross-functional teams are collaborative, and the culture values analytical rigor and thoughtful debate. Exposure to global business. Supporting IET provides insight into diverse markets—LNG, turbomachinery, industrial solutions, new energy—and offers opportunities to partner with teams across multiple regions and product lines. Leadership encourages data-driven decision-making. There is meaningful focus on improving forecasting accuracy, margin discipline, and operational cadence. Finance is seen as a strategic partner, not just a reporting function. Good flexibility and work-life balance. Hybrid work is genuinely supported, especially for roles tied to analysis, planning, and commercial strategy. Strong learning opportunities. Access to digital tools, internal programs, and cross-functional projects helps develop commercial and financial acumen.

Cons

Complex matrix structure. Decision-making can be slower than ideal due to layers of approvals and global coordination. Navigating legacy processes requires patience. Systems and data challenges. Integration of multiple ERPs and planning tools can create inefficiencies and require workarounds. Progress is being made, but modernization is ongoing. Heavy meeting cadence. Operating rhythms can be demanding, especially during forecast cycles and commercial reviews. Calendar load sometimes limits deep work time. Talent development varies by manager. While many leaders invest heavily in development, the experience can vary depending on the team and direct manager. Compensation is fair but not industry-leading. Base pay and bonuses are competitive, but long-term incentives and equity could be stronger compared to peers in the industrial and energy technology sectors.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All