Hard to watch - Engineer Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
Jan 23, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One notable advantage of the company is its excellent retirement plan. The employee ownership scheme significantly enhances retirement benefits, provided the company maintains its performance.

Cons

The RTO has destroyed the company. The culture is on life support as most people who cared were forced out. We preach psychological safety but have people worried about being let go for RTO or being tracked by a beacon

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
2y
Thank you for sharing your feedback about our culture, hybrid work, and access control system upgrades. It’s evident that you care about Black & Veatch, and we appreciate that you are taking the time to voice your concerns. We have been working in a hybrid environment for more than a year, and we’re still listening and engaged in thoughtful dialogue about it. Safety is a Black & Veatch core value and psychological safety is important to us, too. We care about your safety in inclement weather and trust you to use your best judgement regarding your travel plans during poor weather. The access control upgrades have been a part of our technology roadmap for several years, and this enhancement will provide first responders with critical information in the event of an emergency. The enhancement is needed to support a hybrid working environment where people are in and out on different days and times. Thanks again for providing your thoughts as we navigate this new working landscape together.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3w
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All