Decent job depending on your department - Anonymous employee Braze Employee Review

3.0
Feb 6, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Typically, individuals receive promotions or title changes when they consistently meet expectations every two to three years. The C-Suite tends to be very fiscally conservative, resulting in solid job stability even amidst the turmoil often surrounding our industry. Some of the newcomers are bringing sharp, unique perspectives that are greatly appreciated.

Cons

The "Peter Principle" is rampant here. For those unfamiliar, the theory suggests that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence": employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a position where they are no longer competent. I can say firsthand that nearly every manager, from middle management to many directors, seems vastly out of touch with the business needs at times and instead focuses only on revenue-based activities rather than positive customer outcomes, regardless of the revenue generated. Some departments need a significant shake-up from the top down, as complacency has festered to the point of stagnation in innovation. You almost can't suggest an idea within Braze's four walls without someone asking how we can monetize it. Part of this comes with the territory of being a public company, but it can be almost sickening sometimes.

Explore other reviews about Braze

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Phenomenal company culture, unlimited PTO actually encouraged, solid onboarding structure, great pay, incredible benefits especially for parents.

Cons

Extremely diverse tech stack that can be difficult to master. CSM roles involve significant strategic guidance beyond normal role expectations. Workload can vary significantly based on which clients you receive.

2.0
Jul 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Braze has many smart, kind, and talented people, and I had the chance to work with colleagues who genuinely cared about doing good work. The company also gave me opportunities to grow and lead programs at scale. The product is respected, the customer base is impressive, and there are still teams doing excellent work despite the broader challenges.

Cons

The company became increasingly frenetic, with shifting priorities, unrealistic goals, and too much work happening without clear ownership or coordinated strategy. Decisions often felt reactive, and teams responsible for execution were not consistently included early enough in planning. There was also a growing emphasis on visibility, internal process, and last-minute requests, which made it harder to focus on thoughtful work or build sustainable programs. The experience can vary significantly by team and manager. Strong performers may find themselves rewarded with more volume rather than more influence, while organizational changes and unclear direction can make it difficult to understand how decisions are being made.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All