The Worst Company That I've Ever Worked For - Corporate Services Representative CBRE Employee Review

1.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Honestly? Not much. The vision insurance was decent, I guess. Truthfully though, there wasn't much.

Cons

Management's refusal to allow employees freedom. I routinely got praise from the client and hit the maximum score on my goals. If things weren't done "by the book", they were wrong. The health insurance was awful. Going to self-employment, one of the things that you hear is that you're going to pay a lot for health insurance. However, I'm actually paying LESS than when I worked for CBRE. When you work for CBRE, don't consider job security something that you're going to have. I saw two employees with 15+ years for the company get laid off, with zero severance and no option to transfer elsewhere, unless they wanted to uproot their families and move states for more work and a pay cut. This is the worst company that I've ever had the displeasure to work for. If you have literally any other option of employment, please consider doing that.

Explore other reviews about CBRE

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A great organization to work for with friendly staff.

Cons

insurance is not as good as I would have hoped.

1.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing, nothing. Run away from here. You are just a number company

Cons

Everything. Positive reviews don’t guarantee job security — you received strong feedback but were still let go. • Lack of documented performance concerns — no warnings before termination. • Unclear expectations — guidance during hiring (van movement not monitored) didn’t match later enforcement. • Limited transparency in decision-making — reasons for termination weren’t clearly tied to measurable issues. • Communication gaps between leadership levels — direct managers praised performance, yet outcome differed. • Effort not always formally recognized — early arrivals, skipped lunches, and cost-saving work not reflected. • Inconsistent policy application — flexibility allowed initially but later possibly used against you. • Rumor-based concerns — issues like tool suspicion not formally addressed or resolved. • Extra initiative not necessarily valued — using personal vehicle, travel offers, and vendor cost savings didn’t protect role.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All