Company overview - Finance & Accounting Process Specialist Capgemini Employee Review

2.0
Jun 10, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Only team members there is good

Cons

I worked at Capgemini for over two years, and unfortunately, my experience was largely negative. While Capgemini is often perceived as a major global consulting firm, internally it operates more like a mid-tier company. One of the biggest issues I faced was the extremely low compensation, which was far below industry standards. Despite the poor pay, the workload continuously increased over time, with little to no regard for work-life balance. The project I was assigned to was, without exaggeration, one of the worst I’ve ever seen. It was poorly managed, chaotic, and deeply demoralizing. There was no clear direction, and leadership often lacked the competence or willingness to address critical issues. Without any prior discussion or consent, I was abruptly moved to a different team. This transition was handled in a completely unprofessional manner. Later on, I was put under pressure by management and essentially forced to resign. It felt like I was being pushed out simply to make room for someone else or meet internal metrics. Overall, I cannot recommend Capgemini to anyone looking for a stable, respectful, or rewarding work environment. My time there was disappointing and disheartening, and I hope others can avoid a similar experience.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All