employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Clark Construction Group

Engaged Employer

Project Manager - Project Manager Clark Construction Group Employee Review

5.0
Jul 27, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Every day is different...on purpose...if the projects are not different each day then we aren't building. - The teams that we have come from all areas of the country, all backgrounds, and all seem to find a rhythm that creates some incredible projects. - We are a relatively flat organization where Engineers, Superintendents, and Project Managers have frequent and personal interactions with the leadership of the company.

Cons

- At times, everyone must roll their sleeves up and get down in the details of complicated problem sets. - Not everything goes according to plan and that can set a project team back for months at a time. - Tough jobs typically come from tough clients.

Explore other reviews about Clark Construction Group

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very receptive management and great people to work with

Cons

Benefits are not anything tremendous

2.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some benefits and activities. Nice office space. Some good colleagues

Cons

The organization is highly bureaucratic, and in my experience, there was often a lack of clear direction while expectations remained exceptionally high. Some executives expected results without providing sufficient context or guidance, making it difficult to succeed consistently. There appears to be a high level of turnover, and there is a strong preference for all Executive Assistants to work in the same style as a favored individual rather than recognizing different, yet equally effective, approaches. Initiative and autonomy were not always valued. The company requires Executive Assistants to work in the office five days a week with little to no flexibility. Additionally, discussions around compensation, such as requesting a salary increase or bonus, can sometimes coincide with increased scrutiny of performance. Minor issues may be disproportionately emphasized during performance reviews, potentially affecting compensation decisions. Collaboration across offices was another challenge. Working with Executive Assistants in other locations could be frustrating due to inconsistent responsiveness, limited cooperation, and, at times, a condescending approach. Scheduling was particularly difficult because the CEO’s Executive Assistant held significant influence over calendar decisions, and meetings could be canceled or declined without much consideration for the needs of other executives, creating ongoing coordination challenges.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All