employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Clark Construction Group

Engaged Employer

A great place to work with smart, fun people. - Anonymous employee Clark Construction Group Employee Review

5.0
Sep 21, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

We build some of the most iconic buildings in the country. The company cares about the employees and the employees' families. There are so many opportunities to learn every aspect of the business. The rotation program and Clark University provides an amazing learning opportunity. Clark acts with integrity as a core principle and stands behind what we build. We are a company of smart fun people who have a large positive impact on our communities.

Cons

We work hard but have a lot of fun. You need to have a passion for what you do to find happiness and success here.

Explore other reviews about Clark Construction Group

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very receptive management and great people to work with

Cons

Benefits are not anything tremendous

2.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some benefits and activities. Nice office space. Some good colleagues

Cons

The organization is highly bureaucratic, and in my experience, there was often a lack of clear direction while expectations remained exceptionally high. Some executives expected results without providing sufficient context or guidance, making it difficult to succeed consistently. There appears to be a high level of turnover, and there is a strong preference for all Executive Assistants to work in the same style as a favored individual rather than recognizing different, yet equally effective, approaches. Initiative and autonomy were not always valued. The company requires Executive Assistants to work in the office five days a week with little to no flexibility. Additionally, discussions around compensation, such as requesting a salary increase or bonus, can sometimes coincide with increased scrutiny of performance. Minor issues may be disproportionately emphasized during performance reviews, potentially affecting compensation decisions. Collaboration across offices was another challenge. Working with Executive Assistants in other locations could be frustrating due to inconsistent responsiveness, limited cooperation, and, at times, a condescending approach. Scheduling was particularly difficult because the CEO’s Executive Assistant held significant influence over calendar decisions, and meetings could be canceled or declined without much consideration for the needs of other executives, creating ongoing coordination challenges.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All