employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Clark Construction Group

Engaged Employer

Great company with great people - Anonymous employee Clark Construction Group Employee Review

4.0
Nov 7, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company with stellar training opportunities, long hours as is common within the industry

Cons

Pay is not adjusted adequately for cost of living in different regions

Explore other reviews about Clark Construction Group

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very receptive management and great people to work with

Cons

Benefits are not anything tremendous

2.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some benefits and activities. Nice office space. Some good colleagues

Cons

The organization is highly bureaucratic, and in my experience, there was often a lack of clear direction while expectations remained exceptionally high. Some executives expected results without providing sufficient context or guidance, making it difficult to succeed consistently. There appears to be a high level of turnover, and there is a strong preference for all Executive Assistants to work in the same style as a favored individual rather than recognizing different, yet equally effective, approaches. Initiative and autonomy were not always valued. The company requires Executive Assistants to work in the office five days a week with little to no flexibility. Additionally, discussions around compensation, such as requesting a salary increase or bonus, can sometimes coincide with increased scrutiny of performance. Minor issues may be disproportionately emphasized during performance reviews, potentially affecting compensation decisions. Collaboration across offices was another challenge. Working with Executive Assistants in other locations could be frustrating due to inconsistent responsiveness, limited cooperation, and, at times, a condescending approach. Scheduling was particularly difficult because the CEO’s Executive Assistant held significant influence over calendar decisions, and meetings could be canceled or declined without much consideration for the needs of other executives, creating ongoing coordination challenges.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All