employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Company culture is aggressive and unwelcoming - Managing Consultant CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

2.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some good people depending on the project.

Cons

Company culture is aggressive and unwelcoming. Leadership has no clear direction and doesn’t build confidence. What they say and what they do don’t match. The COO sets rules but doesn’t follow them. Pay is low compared to similar companies, and growth is limited. The work gets repetitive and not very engaging. Work-life balance is hard to keep. People leave often, so the high turnover is obvious. Overall, it ends up being a pretty terrible place if you want stability or growth.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
2mo
Thank you for sharing your experience. We’re glad to hear you had the opportunity to work with some great colleagues during your time here. We’re sorry to hear that aspects of the culture, leadership approach, and overall experience did not align with what we strive to provide. We appreciate you taking the time to share this feedback and will keep it in mind as the firm continues to evolve.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All