employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Terrible leadership, Employees leaving - Managing Consultant CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

1.0
May 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some employees are nice and they will give you food for the holidays!

Cons

- I genuinely feel frustrated even writing this. - Leadership behaves as if this company is far bigger and more important than it really is. - Managers constantly shift plans with no stability, while meetings are filled with empty buzzwords that never translate into real improvement for employees. - Work quickly becomes repetitive and people are reduced to numbers instead of being judged on actual effort or quality. - There is no real support for learning or career growth, which pushes people to start looking for exits almost immediately. - The overall attitude from leadership creates a draining culture where employees rarely feel valued or respected. - It would not be surprising if this company does not last another 10 years.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
1mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We are sorry to hear that your experience did not reflect the environment we strive to create for our employees. We value employee feedback and remain committed to fostering a workplace where our people feel supported, heard, and connected to the firm's direction. We wish you well in your future endeavors.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All