employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

We organized every six months and nothing changed except my desk location - Former Employee CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

2.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people I worked with day to day were sharp and actually fought to do good work, even while everything around them was collapsing.

Cons

- I spent more time trapped in reorganization meetings than actually doing my job. - Every few months came another restructure, another reshuffle, different reporting lines, different strategies that completely contradicted the last ones. - It was maddening watching the same failures get "fixed" by endlessly moving boxes around on an org chart. - Nobody knew who anyone reported to or what the actual strategy even was anymore. - The chaos was not even productive-- it was nonstop confusion disguised as progress. - By the end I stopped caring because whatever plan existed would be abondoned in six months anyway.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
1mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We are sorry to hear that your experience did not reflect the environment we strive to create for our employees. We recognize that periods of change can be challenging, and clear communication, alignment, and transparency are critical during times of organizational evolution. We appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective and wish you all the best in your future endeavors.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All