employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged Employer

Never had the autonomy to make actual decisions because everything was constantly questioned and second guessed! - Managing Consultant CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

1.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The firm had an established client base to work from and the McLean office was actually well situated.

Cons

• Constant scrutiny and endless second guessing made it obvious there was no real trust in my abilities despite my title. • Decisions that should have been mine were repeatedly overridden by people above me. • Client recommendations were buried in approval layers, causing missed opportunities and unnecessary delays. • The lack of autonomy made it impossible to build real ownership or confidence in my work. • Strategic initiatives I proposed were ignored or completely rewritten, making the entire experience feel pointless.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All