Great company with very friendly work environment - IT Asset Management Analyst Crowley Employee Review

4.0
Oct 8, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great, friendly work environment Lots of room for professional growth Caring managers that strive to get their staff recognition Work from home potential

Cons

There are not any significant cons of working for this company.

avatar
Crowley Response
5y
We appreciate your endorsement of our company culture, development opportunities, leadership quality and flex working environment. We are happy to hear that you are having a great employment experience.

Explore other reviews about Crowley

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Family owned company where people build relationships and have opportunities

Cons

Change is a major theme.

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedules (hybrid) and new opportunities for some

Cons

My experience with Crowley Maritime Corporation highlights systemic leadership and cultural challenges that significantly impact organizational effectiveness and employee well-being. At a high level, there appears to be a persistent gap in leadership accountability, where individuals in leadership roles who do not demonstrate effective management, communication, or team development capabilities are not addressed or replaced. This lack of corrective action allows ineffective leadership practices to persist, ultimately influencing team performance, morale, and overall operational outcomes. From an organizational culture standpoint, the work environment reflects characteristics commonly associated with toxicity, including limited collaboration, diminished trust, and a lack of psychological safety. There is a noticeable absence of respect in day-to-day interactions, with insufficient emphasis on professional conduct, inclusivity, and mutual support. This environment not only affects employee engagement but also undermines the foundational elements required for high-performing teams. A particularly concerning aspect is the organization’s handling of workforce reductions. During layoffs, there appeared to be minimal effort to explore alternative solutions such as internal redeployment or reassignment of impacted employees to other roles within the organization. This reflects a lack of strategic workforce planning and, more critically, a lack of empathy in decision-making processes that directly affect employees’ livelihoods. The absence of transparent communication and compassionate leadership during these periods further contributed to a perception that employee well-being was not a priority.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All