employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

DUTY FIRST CONSULTING

Is this your company?

Great place for starting your career - Consultant DUTY FIRST CONSULTING Employee Review

4.0
Sep 29, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Duty First Consulting is great for those starting out in their career in federal consulting. DFC offers many opportunities to gain experience with supporting a variety of Federal Departments, clients, and projects. Managers are also very supportive and open to providing feedback and helping you grow to meet and achieve your professional goals. Since DFC is a small company, it allows for employees to get involved in internal efforts and business development opportunities. The company culture and staff at DFC are very welcoming and provides a lot of opportunities to make connections and bond with colleagues on your team as well as other service lines in the company. DFC also has a good benefit package and offers a lot of options for health insurance plans with some added benefits like the quarterly wellness benefits.

Cons

For the DC area, pay is low compared to other smaller federal consulting firms. If you are just starting out in consulting, the low pay is outweighed by gaining valuable experience to help you succeed and provide exceptional quality work for a variety of clients which can easily be transferred to future career endeavors.

Explore other reviews about DUTY FIRST CONSULTING

5.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good benefits 401k, good career progression, kind people

Cons

none, all good, can't think of anything wrong

2.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

● Opportunities for direct client interaction. ● Generally friendly and collegial work environment among peers. ● Exposure to a variety of workstreams and real-world client scenarios.

Cons

● Expectations and standards varied significantly across managers and task leads, leading to inconsistencies in how work was evaluated. ● Clarifying questions were not always addressed in a timely manner, especially when tasks had short turnaround times and minimal background. ● Deliverables were judged against expectations that were not clearly communicated, regardless of requests for clarification. ● Overall lack of structured guidance or documentation; requests for specific expectations or general guidelines were acknowledged but rarely fulfilled. ● Feedback was vague or reactive rather than instructional, making it difficult to course-correct. ● Limited mentorship or effort from leadership to support improvement and long-term success, including during formal performance reviews. ● Waves of onboarding junior-level staff led to obvious worsening of operational organization and increasing negligence in management.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All