employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

DUTY FIRST CONSULTING

Is this your company?

Trauma-Inducing, Do Not Work Here - Senior Management Analyst DUTY FIRST CONSULTING Employee Review

1.0
Sep 13, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented younger teammates, casual atmosphere in the office, small staff so you don't feel like a number or a cog in a machine.

Cons

As I look back on my entire professional career, I can say without a doubt that working at Duty First Consulting put myself into one of the most toxic, unrewarding, and downright awful experiences. I think that some high school summer jobs have a better culture than DFC was able to cultivate. The management at this company have made a serious culture of cliques, wielding power, fear, and unprofessionalism that reminds you of an office cooked up for a movie--or a toxic sorority--rather than an actual workplace. I want to say that the benefits make up for it, but relative to other firms and even government the perks and compensation are nothing to write home about. There is limited opportunity for growth, so MAs and SMAs are generally just used as exhaustible tools for a couple years before they move on to a better job.

Explore other reviews about DUTY FIRST CONSULTING

5.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good benefits 401k, good career progression, kind people

Cons

none, all good, can't think of anything wrong

2.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

● Opportunities for direct client interaction. ● Generally friendly and collegial work environment among peers. ● Exposure to a variety of workstreams and real-world client scenarios.

Cons

● Expectations and standards varied significantly across managers and task leads, leading to inconsistencies in how work was evaluated. ● Clarifying questions were not always addressed in a timely manner, especially when tasks had short turnaround times and minimal background. ● Deliverables were judged against expectations that were not clearly communicated, regardless of requests for clarification. ● Overall lack of structured guidance or documentation; requests for specific expectations or general guidelines were acknowledged but rarely fulfilled. ● Feedback was vague or reactive rather than instructional, making it difficult to course-correct. ● Limited mentorship or effort from leadership to support improvement and long-term success, including during formal performance reviews. ● Waves of onboarding junior-level staff led to obvious worsening of operational organization and increasing negligence in management.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All