employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

DUTY FIRST CONSULTING

Is this your company?

Consider employment elsewhere - Senior Management Analyst DUTY FIRST CONSULTING Employee Review

1.0
Dec 29, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work directly with clients and provide input on tasks. Depending on your education or experience you will be asked to provide plenty of feedback and input. Lots of opportunity to take on tasks independently. Pay is alright but don’t expect any bonuses. Managers require 3 days a week in office and allow 2 remote.

Cons

Sit in a cubicle from 9-5 or later everyday at a computer. Will constantly be on calls with your team or clients and working on tasks. Be prepared to justify every minute of your day to your manager and explain each task you did. You will literally check in and check out each day. Company culture is weird and extremely cliquey. Truly don’t understand how people have stayed at this company for as long as they have. Managers and senior consultants will critique every single item you work on. Don’t be surprised if they can’t give a strong answer when you ask for feedback or clarification. Ultimately be prepared to be a secretary for the clients. The company might say you’re doing a great job and working on essential tasks but don’t be surprised when you’re actively managing a calendar for clients. Super essential!

Explore other reviews about DUTY FIRST CONSULTING

5.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good benefits 401k, good career progression, kind people

Cons

none, all good, can't think of anything wrong

2.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

● Opportunities for direct client interaction. ● Generally friendly and collegial work environment among peers. ● Exposure to a variety of workstreams and real-world client scenarios.

Cons

● Expectations and standards varied significantly across managers and task leads, leading to inconsistencies in how work was evaluated. ● Clarifying questions were not always addressed in a timely manner, especially when tasks had short turnaround times and minimal background. ● Deliverables were judged against expectations that were not clearly communicated, regardless of requests for clarification. ● Overall lack of structured guidance or documentation; requests for specific expectations or general guidelines were acknowledged but rarely fulfilled. ● Feedback was vague or reactive rather than instructional, making it difficult to course-correct. ● Limited mentorship or effort from leadership to support improvement and long-term success, including during formal performance reviews. ● Waves of onboarding junior-level staff led to obvious worsening of operational organization and increasing negligence in management.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All