For a large company, there's alot to love. - Hardware discipline Engineer Dow Employee Review

5.0
Apr 26, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dow takes safety seriously. It impresses me how much they focus on requiring their employees to do work safely. They also put a large dose of responsibility and trust in their engineers to do what they think best in various situations. They'll give you plenty of rope if you ask for it. Also, most managers were already reasonable about your vacation requests. After Covid, they seem to be even more flexible if you book around big deliveries.

Cons

The corporate organization is wierd at best. Often times managers will preside over groups working on tasks completely outside their wheelhouse. They know little about the groups efforts and it's more of a chore and therefore don't go to bat hard enough for that group.

avatar
Dow Response
5y
Thank you for sharing your feedback! Each employee’s experience is valuable to us as we work together in becoming the most innovative, customer-centric, inclusive and sustainable materials science company in the world.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
Jun 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Surrounded by great people to work with.

Cons

There are opportunities of pay progression for good performers.

2.0
Mar 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All