Super enviroment - Anonymous employee ENGIE Employee Review

5.0
Aug 30, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

team, salary, aware of climate change, a family

Cons

shared desk policy, hyrearchy, location

avatar
ENGIE Response
2y
Hello, thank you for your opinion. We wish you all the best for the future at ENGIE. You are part of the family of Transition Makers, we will make the energy transition happen. We work in open space, which makes it easier to talk to colleagues and reinforces the family spirit that is so important to you and to us. :)

Explore other reviews about ENGIE

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Bon salaire de stagiaire, bon encadrement

Cons

Rien a dire de special

1.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Energy transition mission — The company’s stated purpose around decarbonization is compelling, and some teams genuinely care about delivering meaningful work. Global footprint — Access to international projects and exposure to large‑scale infrastructure.

Cons

HR alignment with management — HR consistently protects management rather than employees. Issues of mistreatment are often ignored, and retaliation is a real concern despite policies claiming zero tolerance. Humiliation and mistreatment — Employees are frequently spoken to disrespectfully, sometimes publicly. Escalating concerns rarely leads to resolution. Retaliation culture — Speaking up can result in negative consequences. Many employees stay silent out of fear. Low compensation — Salaries tend to fall below industry averages, with limited room for negotiation or adjustment. Incompetent leadership — Many leaders lack the experience needed to manage technical teams. Promotions often appear politically driven, with a noticeable preference for French nationals. Micromanagement — Leaders without hands‑on experience frequently micromanage seasoned professionals, creating frustration and inefficiency. Rigid office attendance — Flexibility has disappeared. Employees are threatened with termination if they don’t comply with strict in‑office requirements (e.g., 3 days minimum, 7‑hour presence). Punitive parking policies — Some employees were forced to pay daily parking fees as a form of punishment. No career development — Even inexpensive training is denied. Although development is advertised as a priority, in practice it is not supported for everyone. Lack of growth pathways — Promotions are rare, unclear, and often unrelated to merit. Unclear and biased performance evaluations — Performance reviews often rely on subjective, unsupported criteria, leading to inconsistent ratings and an unusually high number of employees placed on PIPs. Managers frequently introduce personal bias into evaluations, creating an environment where outcomes feel predetermined rather than based on actual performance. Benefits — average for the industry, higher end cost for health insurance premiums.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All