Unprofessional and unethical Kenya Country Director - Manager ENGIE Employee Review

1.0
Sep 25, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is nothing good working for the country.Work there at your own risk and if only you are desperate for a job.

Cons

Working environment is very toxic with the country director insulting employees. The management has been resigning due to the unprofessionalism of the country director which is scary for the junior staff The values of the company are not practiced with the current Country Director making all decisions which are very poor. The Country Director operates daily with threats of dismissal

avatar
ENGIE Response
2y
Thank you for your feedback, which is well received and important to us, as we are strongly committed to continuously improving our workplace environment. ENGIE Energy Access Kenya is currently undergoing a business transformation that may present challenges to the organisation. We want to assure you that we are dedicated to managing this transition in a fair and respectful manner. Our primary goal is to ensure the continued success of our operations in Kenya, while maintaining a good working environment, treating our stakeholders in a respectful manner, and providing the best service to our valued last-mile customers. We take all feedback towards the company or its management very seriously, and any concerns raised are investigated further. If you wish to further discuss, we encourage you to connect through our dedicated line at ethics.eea@engie.com

Explore other reviews about ENGIE

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Bon salaire de stagiaire, bon encadrement

Cons

Rien a dire de special

1.0
Jul 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Energy transition mission — The company’s stated purpose around decarbonization is compelling, and some teams genuinely care about delivering meaningful work. Global footprint — Access to international projects and exposure to large‑scale infrastructure.

Cons

HR alignment with management — HR consistently protects management rather than employees. Issues of mistreatment are often ignored, and retaliation is a real concern despite policies claiming zero tolerance. Humiliation and mistreatment — Employees are frequently spoken to disrespectfully, sometimes publicly. Escalating concerns rarely leads to resolution. Retaliation culture — Speaking up can result in negative consequences. Many employees stay silent out of fear. Low compensation — Salaries tend to fall below industry averages, with limited room for negotiation or adjustment. Incompetent leadership — Many leaders lack the experience needed to manage technical teams. Promotions often appear politically driven, with a noticeable preference for French nationals. Micromanagement — Leaders without hands‑on experience frequently micromanage seasoned professionals, creating frustration and inefficiency. Rigid office attendance — Flexibility has disappeared. Employees are threatened with termination if they don’t comply with strict in‑office requirements (e.g., 3 days minimum, 7‑hour presence). Punitive parking policies — Some employees were forced to pay daily parking fees as a form of punishment. No career development — Even inexpensive training is denied. Although development is advertised as a priority, in practice it is not supported for everyone. Lack of growth pathways — Promotions are rare, unclear, and often unrelated to merit. Unclear and biased performance evaluations — Performance reviews often rely on subjective, unsupported criteria, leading to inconsistent ratings and an unusually high number of employees placed on PIPs. Managers frequently introduce personal bias into evaluations, creating an environment where outcomes feel predetermined rather than based on actual performance. Benefits — average for the industry, higher end cost for health insurance premiums.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All