Eaton Review - Sales Engineer Eaton Employee Review

3.0
Aug 18, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Pros are as Follows: Company Car. Stable Income. Flexible Schedule No micromanagement Many Training Opportunities Average compensation Good middle management

Cons

Goals and sales metrics change often and are not clearly defined Sales verticals are set up in a manner that creates overlap and competition between sales persons and sales teams. Poor communication across divisions Do not honor distributor relationships

Explore other reviews about Eaton

5.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people, interesting work, lots of free food

Cons

No bonuses, underpaid for the level of work we do

avatar
Eaton Response
1w
Thank you for sharing your experience and for the many years you spent with Eaton. We're glad to hear you enjoyed working with great colleagues and found the work interesting. We're sorry to hear that you feel our compensation was not up to par. We evaluate each role annually against industry standards to ensure a competitive and fair package.
3.0
Jul 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Q & CI are supported overall from the top. Quality Management Systems and procedures are embedded in the company culture...across all of Eaton. No matter what site or city you go to, it is overall the same QMS. Roles and processes are standardized, people know where to find their standard work and understand the processes...although not always followed. Overall support of iERGs is good. A lot of people stay for their entire career, so longevity can be a pro, but a con as well. Company recognition is good overall.

Cons

Low pay. Good ol' boy network for promotions. Slow to promote. Calibration process for annual performance ratings is a bit questionable at times. Company culture drastically changed over the years as LDPs (Leadership Development Participants...a rotational program) started being promoted too quickly without the maturity, wisdom and experience needed for the roles. Lack of diversity at local sites, although corporate level roles were very diverse.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All