Opportunities for simultaneous career progression and work-life balance - Anonymous employee Experian Employee Review

5.0
Oct 11, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Organizational aim to keep meetings and work schedules within the normal working hours — meetings before 7am and after 6pm local time are infrequent, and there’s no expectation to accept when requests outside this time are received. - Opportunities for career progression ONLY if you take ownership of committing to that path; stretch/upwards roles are not handed to people on a silver platter unless they vocalize and pursue the path - Commitment to remote work flexibility — we’ve gotten A LOT done and are more efficient at our jobs while working remotely; there’s not an organizational call to return to in-office work

Cons

- Leadership does play favorites to people they trust; so loss of that trust may decimate any chance of upwards movement - We generally tend to over-invite people to meetings (lots of cooks in the kitchen for decision making), and this locks up people’s calendars - The salaries of those who are recently hired tend to be much higher than the salaries of those who have been employed at Experian for a while; it’s nearly impossible to bring an existing employee’s salary to market levels unless that employee secures another offer and is a real threat to leave

Explore other reviews about Experian

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work culture! Everyone is welcoming. I really like the work-life balance.

Cons

There are really no cons that I can think of.

avatar
Experian Response
3w
Thank you for sharing your experience. We’re glad to hear that you’ve felt welcomed and supported, and that work‑life balance has been a positive part of your role at Experian. We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and are happy to have you on the team.
1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The fact they had Remote work

Cons

In my experience, management lacked consistency, transparency, and empathy when addressing employee concerns. After dedicating nearly 16 years to the company, I felt my years of service and commitment were not meaningfully considered when employment decisions were made. I received my first disciplinary action in February 2026 related to FMLA reporting requirements. From my perspective, I was placed on a final corrective action without prior coaching or progressive discipline, which I found surprising after many years with the company. A few months later, I was terminated following a security-related incident while working remotely. I felt I was not given a meaningful opportunity to explain the circumstances before the decision was made, leaving me with the impression that the outcome had already been determined. I also experienced frustration when seeking guidance from Human Resources regarding bereavement policies. I did not feel my concerns were fully addressed or that I received clear explanations to help me understand the company’s position. Overall, I left feeling unsupported and believing that HR’s primary role was to protect the organization’s interests rather than advocate for employees. While every workplace must uphold policies and compliance standards, I believe there should also be room for fairness, open communication, and consideration of an employee’s long-standing dedication and overall performance. My experience left me feeling undervalued and, ultimately, discarded after nearly 16 years of loyal service.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All