Favoratism - Senior Scrum Master Fannie Mae Employee Review

3.0
Jul 15, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most of the organizations in Fannie Mae are full of senior leadership that encourages a culture of "you scratch-my-back-I'll scratch-yours". To enable this, they surround themselves with people who are "Yes Men". Most of the promotions are based on this dynamics of favoritism culture. It is more evident in the IT/Technology groups. Fannie Mae has some very bright people, but they stick around because either they have developed inertia or they are not employable outside. Most of leadership in IT/Technology is non-technical (including tons of managers and directors) who don't have a depth/breadth of technology comparable to a fresh CS graduate from a decent university. But they are in the top paying jobs because of their ability to "network".

Cons

Excellent benefits, decent work-life balance (even though it is deteriorating fast), okay pay structure.

Explore other reviews about Fannie Mae

5.0
May 25, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

benefits, pay, work life balance

Cons

no cons to be honest

3.0
Jul 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I had thought I’d stay there until retirement. Pay was pretty good and while upward mobility was limited there was an open environment for learning and getting involved in new things. The company was socially conscious with volunteer time available. Flex schedules were available with manager approval and that helped us effectively implement work from home in 2020. We did work a lot of long hours to get projects done but the work seemed to be appreciated and rewarded.

Cons

For a company that had been highly profitable, Bill Pulte came in and started demanding changes for the company to be run more like one on the verge of bankruptcy. Managers were forced to spend significant time managing attendance and schedules and constantly justifying staffing just to have that ignored anyway. Anybody below a Director was cut completely out of these decisions meaning managers would show up to meetings to find the no-shows had been let go with no warning. You just started to see on people’s faces they were miserable, many long time associates quietly hoping they’d be included in the next round of cuts. It’s too bad, a company I had thought I’d retire with really just became toxic.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All