Mortgage Servicing - Customer Service Representative Flagstar Bank Employee Review

4.0
Jul 9, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was able to work from home for the 2 years I worked for them. Very lenient management with KPI's. Honestly, it was dang near impossible to get fired from there. I liked working with everyone. Decent pay all things considered. Learned a ton about mortgages that I wouldn't have otherwise known which helped me transition to a better job. All holidays off. As far as the job is concerned, once you get trained in escrow, be prepared to start dealing with upset customers. The first 6 months are a breeze though as you just take payments, answer basic loan inquiries, things like that. Flagstar was a solid employer.

Cons

As far as the job is concerned, once you get trained in escrow, be prepared to start dealing with upset customers. Like any customer service role, there were abusive callers. Back to back calls from December - April. The job was actually more challenging once you start training in different call types.

Explore other reviews about Flagstar Bank

5.0
Feb 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Cons

N/A during my time with the company

2.0
Mar 10, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Cons

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All