Current Experience After 5 Years with the Company - Site Readiness and Regulatory Specialist II Fortrea Employee Review

2.0
May 3, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. If salaried, Flexible Time Off (FTO) is standard and can be used at any time as long as the work is completed. 2. Since I have worked with the company (Covance turned into LabCorp, which then turned into Fortrea) for the past 5 years, I do have an adequate list of connections within the company and these resources are quite helpful when needing to meet tight deadlines that are expected from the client.

Cons

1. Job security - fear of layoffs 2. No bonuses - merit increases are standard and raises are unheard of outside of promotions, which have not been occurring under LabCorp when the company was LabCorp and the same goes for the current spinoff company, Fortrea. 3. Lack of upward mobility and semi hiring freeze - for example, there are job postings but I am not qualified to apply for a senior scientist or corporate counsel role in India so the posts are not relevant. 4. Health insurance increased this past year and affected all employees but salaries were not adjusted to compensate for this difference. 5. Data-driven and a top-down approach keeps senior management hands-off with making changes for non-executive employees. 6. The company has outsourced our Informed Consent Form Reviewers (and other departments) to India and turnaround time back to the site is slow. I love our teams in Bangalore, but the time difference is affecting deadlines being met.

Explore other reviews about Fortrea

5.0
Oct 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people, good pay, good work life balance.

Cons

I can't think of any.

1.0
Jun 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In my experience, the greatest benefit of working here was the breadth of exposure I gained across my function. That said, much of it came out of necessity rather than design. Due to what I observed as persistent understaffing, high turnover, and recurring rounds of layoffs, I found myself taking on responsibilities that stretched well beyond any defined scope. If you're someone who learns by doing and can tolerate ambiguity, you will walk away having touched more than you would in a more stable environment. Benefits were adequate, though it was my experience that the company announced plans to eliminate dependent coverage starting in 2027, which was a meaningful shift for employees with families.

Cons

In my time here, I found role clarity to be nearly nonexistent. I went without a formal job description for the duration of my tenure, and despite raising it, leadership indicated for well over a year that it was being worked on. That pattern, in my opinion, reflected a broader cultural issue: change was frequent but poorly managed, and directional guidance from leadership felt inconsistent and at times difficult to trust. I personally felt that communication about the company's position and direction was not always straightforward. The organization also appeared, in my view, to default to workforce reductions as a primary business lever rather than investing in stabilization or accountability. When leadership gaps surfaced, my experience was that they were minimized rather than addressed directly. The culture within my dept was also something I struggled with. In my experience, there was significant misalignment around ownership and responsibility, and the dynamic felt more competitive than collaborative. Rather than pulling in the same direction, it often felt like individuals within the team worked against one another rather than in cooperation, which made an already challenging environment that much harder to navigate.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All