Been with GEP for more than 7 years, still don't feel like changing the job - Associate Director GEP Employee Review

5.0
Sep 16, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A company that exemplifies fair, supportive and professional work environment. In its 21st year, with a strength of 5000 employees globally, even today it is a very exciting place to be and there is never a dull day here. A value centric, people driven organization with a unique work culture. The Leadership is extremely approachable and supportive with the awareness that the company's success is because of its employee's contribution. GEP will ensure to reward you for the dedication and the commitment you put into your work.

Cons

Not a place for someone who cannot keep up with the pace at which this company is growing

Explore other reviews about GEP

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good employee and customer centric company

Cons

Nothing specific to call out

1.0
Jul 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice and fun people and new office.

Cons

GEP frequently promotes itself as a company that champions diversity, equity, and inclusion. Those values were highlighted as a core part of the company's culture. Employees—particularly those involved in Employee Resource Groups (ERGs)—were routinely asked to volunteer significant amounts of their own time to organize recruiting events, support DEI initiatives, and foster a workplace where people from all backgrounds felt welcome and represented. That is why the decision to invite Nikki Haley as the keynote speaker for this year's GEP Innovate is shocking and unacceptable. Nikki Haley has a well-documented public record of anti-LGBTQ+ positions, Islamophobic rhetoric, and a deeply troubling political history. Choosing to platform—and reportedly pay a substantial speaking fee to—someone whose public record stands in direct opposition to the values GEP claims to champion sends a clear message that those values are conditional when they become inconvenient. What exactly was she expected to contribute to an innovation conference that could not have been offered by one of the countless accomplished leaders whose records actually align with the company's stated commitment to inclusion? For a company that so proudly markets itself as a DEI champion, this decision was profoundly disappointing. It undermines the work of employees who dedicated countless unpaid hours to building an inclusive culture and recruiting diverse talent. Frankly, it was disturbing to see leadership elevate someone whose views are fundamentally at odds with the environment the company asks its employees to create.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All