Best Company For Full Stack Engineers - Software Engineer GEP Employee Review

3.0
Mar 25, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Opportunity to work on All Latest Stacks & Tools Like . NET Core, Angular5, Azure. 2. End To End Development, Deployment, Support, Testing. 3. Good working Environment with ample of benefits. 4. Flexible working hours. 5. Collaborative Environment. 6. Salary as per Company's Standard.

Cons

1. Too much work Load as you are working on agile process with End To End Development, Deployment, Support, Testing 2. Poor management skills 3. Existing employees receive Less salary as compare to new joiners with same roles and responsibly. 4. You be working more than 8 hours always. 5. less exposure to other stack until and unless you are being part of that project. 6. Expectations are always high as management is more focused on results. 7. Very less changes of getting rewards and Recognition. 8. Very few colleagues are ready to share the knowledge which is increasing dependency. 9. No Work Life Balance

Explore other reviews about GEP

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good employee and customer centric company

Cons

Nothing specific to call out

1.0
Jul 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice and fun people and new office.

Cons

GEP frequently promotes itself as a company that champions diversity, equity, and inclusion. Those values were highlighted as a core part of the company's culture. Employees—particularly those involved in Employee Resource Groups (ERGs)—were routinely asked to volunteer significant amounts of their own time to organize recruiting events, support DEI initiatives, and foster a workplace where people from all backgrounds felt welcome and represented. That is why the decision to invite Nikki Haley as the keynote speaker for this year's GEP Innovate is shocking and unacceptable. Nikki Haley has a well-documented public record of anti-LGBTQ+ positions, Islamophobic rhetoric, and a deeply troubling political history. Choosing to platform—and reportedly pay a substantial speaking fee to—someone whose public record stands in direct opposition to the values GEP claims to champion sends a clear message that those values are conditional when they become inconvenient. What exactly was she expected to contribute to an innovation conference that could not have been offered by one of the countless accomplished leaders whose records actually align with the company's stated commitment to inclusion? For a company that so proudly markets itself as a DEI champion, this decision was profoundly disappointing. It undermines the work of employees who dedicated countless unpaid hours to building an inclusive culture and recruiting diverse talent. Frankly, it was disturbing to see leadership elevate someone whose views are fundamentally at odds with the environment the company asks its employees to create.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All