Pros
Some very smart and mission-driven colleagues at the junior and mid-levels. Exposure to interesting problems in biotech and healthcare data if you seek them out. Flexible remote work options depending on your manager. Decent health benefits. Some teams foster strong peer-to-peer collaboration, despite the dysfunction above them.
Cons
Credit without contribution: The hardest and most impactful work is pushed onto junior employees, while upper management takes the credit. No recognition, no advancement. Gaslighting over accountability: If you call out leadership for taking credit, they’ll deny it. If you prove it, they’ll downplay it. If you keep pushing, you’ll be blamed for being “too sensitive.” Unrealistic expectations, zero support: You’ll be pushed beyond your role because leadership overpromises and underdelivers. When things go wrong, you’ll be blamed for not making the impossible happen. Blocked from decision-making: You’ll be responsible for executing work you weren’t allowed to give input or scope. No title = no invite. Performance reviews = popularity contests: Promotions are based on loyalty and politics. Challenge anything and you’ll be punished — sometimes for years. Toxic FOMO culture: Everyone demands to be in every meeting, even when they add no value. Calendars are full, but nothing gets done. Compensation is a joke: They took away cash grants and replaced them with equity that lost ~70% of its value after taxes and conversion. Petty cost-cutting: They even removed snacks and meals in-office to save pennies. Morale collapsed with it. Leadership dysfunction: Executives are in constant power struggles, inventing fires to look indispensable. Real work gets ignored. Politics over value: Projects are approved based on who’s yelling loudest. Priorities shift weekly. Nothing strategic ever sticks. Fake reorgs: Org charts are reshuffled constantly to create the illusion of progress. The real problems are never addressed. Systemic favoritism toward men: Promotions go to under-qualified men over high-performing women. Bias against assertive women: Women who speak directly are labeled “difficult.” Men doing the same are seen as “leaders.”